Skip to content

Work

21 projects

The Thoughts

  1. explaining thingsJUL 2026How do you explain a complex, honestly boring technical subject so someone leans in instead of glazing over?
  2. adjacency is not accessJUN 2026A floor plan tells you which rooms touch. It will not tell you which rooms you can actually reach, and the gap between those two drawings is where the architecture is hiding.
  3. buildings that respondJUN 2026Right now a building is a fixed guess. Someone chose the ceiling height and the window size years before you arrived, and you live inside their averaged assumptions whether they fit you or not.
  4. experiences are dataMAY 2026You learned what a room does to you by being in rooms. Nobody sat you down with a dataset.
  5. comfort as dataMAY 2026You don't walk into a room and average your experience. You walk in and the thing that's wrong is the thing you notice: the glare, the echo, the cold draft on the back of your neck.
  6. when the tool scores peopleAPR 2026I build things that give a room a score. The obvious next question, and the one I would ask me, is what happens the day somebody uses that score to decide who gets the room.
  7. latent spaceAPR 2026Machine learning borrowed the word space from us, and I would like to check what it did with it.
  8. drawing as interfaceMAR 2026For most of my life the drawing was the output. You designed the thing, then you drew it to prove it existed.
  9. behavior information modelingJAN 2026For thirty years we've been getting very good at Building Information Modeling: every beam, every duct, every clash, tracked to the millimeter.
  10. heritage meets new techDEC 2025The usual choice with an old building is a trap: treat it as a museum piece no one may touch, or drop a glass-and-steel box in the middle and call it modern.
  11. neuroaestheticsDEC 2025Neuroaesthetics is the unglamorous name for a question everyone already feels: why does one room settle you and another keep you on edge?
  12. evolutionary searchNOV 2025Evolutionary search is what I reach for when a problem is too tangled to solve head on: describe what good looks like, then let a population of designs breed, mutate, and compete until something clever falls out.
  13. physics solversNOV 2025A physics solver is the most honest collaborator I have: it doesn't care what I intended, only what I actually built.
  14. computationOCT 2025Computation is not the same as using a computer, and separating the two took me longer than I would like to admit.
  15. what an llm actually isSEP 2025A large language model is a machine that guesses the next word. That is not me being kind to you, that is the whole thing.
  16. generative aiDEC 2023Generative AI made the inspired gesture free. Anyone can produce a thousand renders before lunch, and a render is a promise, not a product.
  17. extended realitySEP 2022I started in a lab strapping headsets onto students to see whether a lesson lands harder when you can walk around inside it.
  18. connecting the dotsJUN 2020When the art class was asked who here dislikes drawing, mine was the only hand that went up. Awkward.

Verve City Walk

What survives when a parametric study meets a real drawing set? 

1 / 7

WHAT

Verve is a two-tower high-rise in Dubai: a shared amenities podium under both towers, balconies cut into the facade rather than hung off it. As a design architect at SOMA I ran the parametric facade studies in Rhino and Grasshopper, then carried what survived into the Revit model: floorplans, facade strategies, the interiors of a residential tower. The same desk carried District O, Enara and Saria from massing studies into their BIM sets.

WHY

These are the years when I learned that a parametric study only matters if it survives contact with a drawing set. Practice is where the elegant definition meets the door schedule, and both have to win.

HOW

  1. Concept stays in Rhino and Grasshopper, where the massing can still change its mind: plot, podium, unit mix, all of it still cheap to move.
  2. Design development, and everything moves into Revit: landscape planning, the typical floor plates, the interior layouts of a luxury tower. This is where gross floor area starts running the project.
  3. Revit families built with the visualization team, and the same model going out three ways: 3D prints, renders, a VR walkthrough in Unreal.
  4. Then every consultant back into the file, structure, MEP, facade, because the Revit model is the submission and it has to be true on the day it leaves.

WHAT CAME OF IT

At university nobody pays for the square meters, so nobody counts them. Then you are in practice and gross floor area is the only number in the room: every balcony, every core shifted, every planted terrace, weighed against that one figure. I used to think that was the boring part. It turns out to be the part that decides what gets built. The proof of the coordination came the day a client put on a headset and walked a tower that did not exist yet.